My staff or board still isn’t convinced.
Here are the benefits of remote monitoring:
-
Monitors report feeling more satisfied using remote imagery in place of in-person monitoring, as shown in the table below.
-
While on an in-person visit, monitors report they are often only able to see a portion of the property while remote imagery gives them a view of the entire property. In fact, remote imagery enables monitors to identify changes to the property they would not have otherwise been able to see from the ground.
-
Another major benefit of remote monitoring is the reduction of risks to staff who may encounter various hazards in the field, such as ticks, snakes or other wild animals, storm damage, steep slopes, unauthorized third-party activities (e.g., marijuana growing operations) and altercations with trespassers.
-
Land trusts have found a number of other uses for remote imagery, including:
Acquisition preparation
Baseline documentation
Violation research and resolution
Ecological monitoring
Restoration
Management plans
Information for grant applications
-
The technology can also be used for larger organizational goals related to:
Climate change impacts
Carbon sequestration
Achieving 30X30 initiative goals
While there are many benefits to remote monitoring, before developing a remote monitoring program, a land trust needs to weigh not only the benefits but also the drawbacks of this type of stewardship. It is essential to conduct a thoughtful property-specific analysis to determine whether remote monitoring is appropriate for a property or a portion thereof.
View practical pointerSatisfaction rating of remote versus in-person monitoring
I have more questions.
Do you have a question not answered here? We can help.
Connect with us