Recommendations for Communicating about Climate Change
Source
Author
About This Document
Before considering any guidance on communication, remember that the first step to developing effective messaging on any topic is to identify who specifically you are trying to reach — the target audience — and what specifically you want them to do in response — the desired outcome.
Here are five research-based recommendations to help you communicate more effectively about climate change.
This product was created by Bridget Macdonald and the Mass ECAN Climate Communications Expert Work Group, with input from Meaghan Guckian and Environmental decision-making lab at UMass for the Land Trust Alliance.
Before considering any guidance on communication, remember that the first step to developing effective messaging on any topic is to identify who specifically you are trying to reach — the target audience — and what specifically you want them to do in response — the desired outcome.
Need help? Visit Developing a Communications Product for a bare-bones outline of the steps to developing a communication product to see where this guidance fits into the process.
Here are five research-based recommendations to help you communicate more effectively about climate change.
Lead with politically neutral messages about conserving resources people already care about.
Most people don’t need to be talked into caring about majestic scenery, clean water, and healthy trees, no matter where they lie on the political spectrum. But even though climate change threatens universally valued natural assets, the term itself is inescapably polarizing because it is portrayed as an ideological issue. And since it is difficult for people without a scientific background to understand the science behind climate change, they rely on political leaders to validate or refute the findings. Rather than rallying us to work together at a time when unity matters most, the term climate change tends to pull us apart.
Politics aside, many of the strategies promoted for climate mitigation, like carbon sequestration, or climate adaptation, like green infrastructure, require considerable explanation. Effective communication should focus on common ground issues, and mutually beneficial outcomes. If you root your messages in universal values and needs, you can make a more compelling case for adaptation actions intended to sustain the things we all care about in the face of changing environmental conditions, without specifying what’s driving those changes.
For example:
Protecting clean water for drinking
Timber for building homes
Open space for recreation
Find trusted spokespeople to deliver your messages.
It’s tempting to assume that opposition to or apathy about climate change is rooted in ignorance. That assumption leads science communicators to try to educate audiences by citing all the facts. In fact, research indicates that ideology, social identity, and trust have much greater influence on how people make sense of complex or controversial topics. That means an individual’s willingness to accept facts is incumbent upon his or her trust of, and respect for, the source of information. Ideally, you want to build this level of trust with your audiences, but that comes from repeated positive interactions over time. So if you are trying to initiate productive conversations about climate change with new audiences, find trusted scientific or natural resource experts in your community to offer evidence and testimonials.
For example:
Wildland firefighters
Cooperative extension agents
County foresters
Neighbors
Focus on local climate change impacts and responses, rather than on the causes.
It’s important to convey a sense of urgency about the immediate consequences of climate change because lives, livelihoods, infrastructure, species, and ecosystems are at stake.
We need to act now to address changes that are underway, and to reduce the impacts of threats on the horizon. But the goal of our messages should be to empower people to act, not to shame them into doing so. Focusing too much on causes may alienate people who may feel they are being judged for their personal contributions to greenhouse gas emissions. Regardless of our individual carbon footprints, we’re all in this together. Everyone has a role to play in climate adaptation, and you can communicate that there are lots of ways for different people to take action in their communities, and lots of compelling reasons for them to do so.
For example:
Flooding of roads
Tree damage from invasive species
Loss of food crops from drought
Avoid technical jargon, instead using language that can be understood by anyone.
Shoptalk, acronyms, and abstract concepts can make people who are not part of the associated profession feel like outsiders. For certain audiences, jargon will be interpreted as a secret code or a red herring, intended to conceal or mislead. And some terms like “resilience”
can have different meanings in different contexts, making them sound vague or elastic. In general, technical language makes it harder for people to understand what you are trying to communicate. That wastes their time, and yours. Your messages should be clear, concrete, and accessible to anybody. Say what you mean in plain language, and engage audiences in dialogue rather than lecturing to them. Once you have established a rapport based on mutual understanding, you may find that some audiences will become more open to nuance and complexity.
For example:
Say “land along rivers”, instead of “riparian zone”
Select photos that bring your messages to life.
Climate change has an image problem, often associated with distant places like the Arctic Circle, and big data like the beleaguered hockey stick graph. Disconcerting? Certainly. Relatable? Nope. If we want people to care enough about climate change to act, we need to show them impacts that are closer to home, responses that are within reach, and role models who look like them. Climate Visuals, an evidence-based resource for climate communication, recommends depicting the following:
Faces – Use photos that show individuals or small groups of people in real places or situations, experiencing or responding to a climate-change impact. Viewers should be able to read the emotions clearly on individual faces. For example: A family standing in front of their flooded home.
Actions – Couple images of impacts with images that demonstrate measures that people can feasibly take in their own lives to respond to or prepare for climate change.
For example: A homeowner installing a rain garden.
Before-and-after: Contrast is a powerful tool. Use images to illustrate a concept that is fundamental to climate change, but difficult to put into words: change over time. Show a familiar place before and after it was affected by dramatic impact. For example: Before and after a flood, drought, or invasive-species infestation.
Scale: Although it is helpful to show climate response on a personal level, it’s not productive to show climate responsibility on a personal level. If you must talk about causes of climate change, zoom out to emphasize that it is a problem of scale. For example: Hundreds of fossil-fuel burning cars on a congested highway, not an individual driving his fossil-fuel burning car to the mall.
Remember: These recommendations are intended to complement your communication process, not to replace it, and not all recommendations will apply to every product or every audience. Take advice into account, but trust your gut. You know your audience better than we do.
Explore related resources
- Alliance members: $70.00
- Non-members: $100.00
Communicating about climate change
Land trusts can use this online guide to help create a climate change communication strategy as your organization’s human and financial resources allow.
Climate Change Basics
This document reviews the basics of climate change, including impacts of climate change and the future impacts of climate change.
Climate Communications Product Analysis: Vermont Land Trust
The accredited Vermont Land Trust created this annual report article, which uses some best practices in climate communications. Here's how this product showcases these recommendations for communicating about climate change.
Applying Climate Messaging to Your Communications Strategy
In this recording, Mary Alice Holley, Conservation Trust for North Carolina, shares how to communicate about your climate change efforts more effectively.
Communicating Climate Change
Join Megan Anderson, from the National Network for Climate Change Interpretation, in this webinar to increase your comfort level in communicating climate change. Using research and techniques developed in partnership with NOAA and the National Science Foundation, this webinar will help you have positive, solutions-focused conversation with your community.
Climate Communications Product Analysis: Maine Coast Heritage Trust
The accredited Maine Coast Heritage Trust created this fundraising product, which highlights some best practices in climate communications. Here's how this product showcases these recommendations for communicating about climate change
Climate Communications Product Analysis: Tug Hill Tomorrow
The accredited Tug Hill Tomorrow created these webpages, which use some best practices in climate communications. Here's how this product showcases these recommendations for communicating about climate change.
Planning for Climate Change
Whether they take credit for it or not, land trusts already plan for climate change. This document outlines tools and approaches land trusts can use to plan for climate change in the short-term and long-term.
Climate Communications Report: How to Talk About Climate Change
This report from the Land Trust Alliance and the Open Space Institute aims to provide helpful guidance on how to connect on climate change and information to help land trusts respond to the greatest challenge of our time.
Climate Change Education Partnership Program
The Climate Change Education Partnership supports climate change communication tools and resources across the country.