Wildlife Preserves, Inc. v. Romero
About This Legal Opinion
In this case, the court concluded that a deer management plan requiring fencing and lethal and nonlethal methods to reduce deer density did not violate the terms of the property’s restrictive covenant which require that the property be left in its natural state and undisturbed by hunting.
Disclaimer
These resources are provided "as is" for informational purposes only, without warranty of any kind. They do not constitute legal or professional advice and do not create an attorney-client relationship. They may not reflect current legal developments and should be adapted for your organization with qualified professional help. The Alliance is not liable for any damages arising from use of or reliance on these resources. Views in individual posts and third-party links/logos are not Alliance endorsements. The Alliance is committed to equal opportunity and does not condone unlawful discrimination.
For accreditation-related materials, please also consult the Land Trust Accreditation Commission website.