Steinen v. Ohio Div. of Wildlife
Location
About This Legal Opinion
A dispute about hunting uses arose out of a land sale and CE transfer. The parties entered into a settlement agreement that the former owner then retracted. Litigation ensued. The appellate court found that the August 2011 document was too vague and uncertain to constitute a binding contract.
Disclaimer
These resources are provided "as is" for informational purposes only, without warranty of any kind. They do not constitute legal or professional advice and do not create an attorney-client relationship. They may not reflect current legal developments and should be adapted for your organization with qualified professional help. The Alliance is not liable for any damages arising from use of or reliance on these resources. Views in individual posts and third-party links/logos are not Alliance endorsements. The Alliance is committed to equal opportunity and does not condone unlawful discrimination.
For accreditation-related materials, please also consult the Land Trust Accreditation Commission website.