Mitchell v. Commissioner – 2013 reconsideration
About This Legal Opinion
The court found that the holding in Kaufman III did not apply to this case and thus did not constitute an intervening change of law that would justify vacating the original decision. Showing deference to the IRS’ interpretation of its own regulations, the 10th Circuit affirmed.
Disclaimer
These resources are provided "as is" for informational purposes only, without warranty of any kind. They do not constitute legal or professional advice and do not create an attorney-client relationship. They may not reflect current legal developments and should be adapted for your organization with qualified professional help. The Alliance is not liable for any damages arising from use of or reliance on these resources. Views in individual posts and third-party links/logos are not Alliance endorsements. The Alliance is committed to equal opportunity and does not condone unlawful discrimination.
For accreditation-related materials, please also consult the Land Trust Accreditation Commission website.