Merill v. Saco Valley Land Trust
About This Legal Opinion
Defendant Saco Valley Land Trust objected to property sale because the easement: I. prohibits ""commercial"" use; and II. restricts the presence of structures on the Protected Property. The court granted plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment as to Count I and partially granted as to Count II.
Disclaimer
These resources are provided "as is" for informational purposes only, without warranty of any kind. They do not constitute legal or professional advice and do not create an attorney-client relationship. They may not reflect current legal developments and should be adapted for your organization with qualified professional help. The Alliance is not liable for any damages arising from use of or reliance on these resources. Views in individual posts and third-party links/logos are not Alliance endorsements. The Alliance is committed to equal opportunity and does not condone unlawful discrimination.
For accreditation-related materials, please also consult the Land Trust Accreditation Commission website.