Lamb v. Wyoming Game and Fish Comm'n
About This Legal Opinion
The appellate court affirmed, holding that the purpose and physical boundaries of the easements were unambiguous, and therefore declined to look at the extrinsic evidence. The court further held that the holder of the easement has the right to prohibit structures and objects
Disclaimer
These resources are provided "as is" for informational purposes only, without warranty of any kind. They do not constitute legal or professional advice and do not create an attorney-client relationship. They may not reflect current legal developments and should be adapted for your organization with qualified professional help. The Alliance is not liable for any damages arising from use of or reliance on these resources. Views in individual posts and third-party links/logos are not Alliance endorsements. The Alliance is committed to equal opportunity and does not condone unlawful discrimination.
For accreditation-related materials, please also consult the Land Trust Accreditation Commission website.