Kumar v. Commissioner
Author
About This Legal Opinion
IRS challenged the amendment clause and valuation. The Tax Court followed Pine Mountain Preserve (affirmed by the 11th Circuit) that the amendment clause is consistent with the granted-in-perpetuity section 170(h)(2)(C). The Tax Court upheld the deduction in its entirety after a lengthy analysis.
Membership Required
This resource is a Land Trust Alliance member benefit for the staff, board and volunteers of land trust and affiliate member organizations, and Alliance donors at the Protector level.
Pine Mountain Preserve, LLLP v. Commissioner - 11th Circuit
Pine Mountain Preserve court rulings and the eventual 11th Circuit ruling is pivotal on the questions of building rights and amendments.
Glade Creek Partners, LLC v. Commissioner
The 11th Circuit vacated part of the Tax Court decision that disallowed the charitable deduction based on the improvements clause in the termination proceeds provision but affirmed the Tax Court’s decision on the valuation penalty.
Pine Mountain Preserve LLLP v. Commissioner - Amicus Brief
This is the Land Trust Alliance 11th circuit amicus brief. Pine Mountain Preserve court rulings and the eventual 11th Circuit ruling is pivotal on the questions of building rights and amendments.
Balsam Mountain Investments, LLC v. Commissioner
Following Belk v. Commissioner, the Tax Court held that the conservation easement did not qualify for a charitable deduction because there was no 'qualified property interest' as required by section 170(h)(2)(C).
IRS Memo on Amendment Clauses
An IRS memo states that an amendment clause will not necessarily cause an easement to fail to satisfy the requirements of section 170(h).
Belk v. Commissioner
The Tax Court held that the conservation easement was not a 'qualified real property interest' because the substitution provision allowed the grantor to change the protected property and thus the easement was not 'granted in perpetuity' under I.R.C. 170(h)(2)(C).
TOT Property Holdings, LLC v. Commissioner (11th Circuit opinion)
Tax Court denied the deduction due to the flawed termination proceeds language. 11th Circuit affirmed. IRS claimed that the easement’s forest management provisions were inconsistent reserved rights but this issue was not addressed or decided.
Lumpkin HC, LLC v. Commissioner
In a proceeds clause case with the improvement deduction language, the Tax Court denied the deductions in full, following Oakbrook Land Holdings LLC, v. Commissioner and Coal Property Holdings, LLC v. Commissioner. The Tax Court declined to consider the IRS' argument on the floating building areas.
SN Worthington Holdings, LLC v. Commissioner
The Tax Court upheld the validity of the proceeds regulation and found the improvements clause to violate the regulation. It also determined that conditional language constituted a savings clause and was therefore unenforceable.
15 West 17th St. LLC v. Commissioner
The IRS challenged a façade easement deduction both on 170(f)(8) grounds and on valuation. The donee submitted an amended Form 990 return for the year in which the donation was made. The tax court held that a traditional contemporaneous written acknowledgment was necessary and denied the deduction.