Document / Legal Opinion

Rajagopalan v. Commissioner

Posted 2021 Updated February 27
About This Legal Opinion

IRS challenged the amendment clause and valuation. The Tax Court followed Pine Mountain Preserve (affirmed by the 11th Circuit) that the amendment clause is consistent with the granted-in-perpetuity section 170(h)(2)(C). The Tax Court upheld the deduction in its entirety after a lengthy analysis.

November 2025 Update: Tax Court denied Sapp’s request for recovery of litigation costs because IRS’ litigation positions were substantially justified.

Disclaimer

These resources are provided "as is" for informational purposes only, without warranty of any kind. They do not constitute legal or professional advice and do not create an attorney-client relationship. They may not reflect current legal developments and should be adapted for your organization with qualified professional help. The Alliance is not liable for any damages arising from use of or reliance on these resources. Views in individual posts and third-party links/logos are not Alliance endorsements. The Alliance is committed to equal opportunity and does not condone unlawful discrimination.

For accreditation-related materials, please also consult the Land Trust Accreditation Commission website.