Share
    Document / Legal Opinion

    Hood Canal Sand & Gravel, LLC v. Brady

    Posted 2020
    Author
    Robert H. Levin
    About This Legal Opinion

    This represents the third federal court decision, along with Sabine River Authority and City of Dallas, Texas v. Hall, 562 F.3d 712 (5th Cir. 2009), holding that acquisition of a conservation easement does not require an Environmental Impact Report under NEPA.

    Disclaimer

    These resources are provided "as is" for informational purposes only, without warranty of any kind. They do not constitute legal or professional advice and do not create an attorney-client relationship. They may not reflect current legal developments and should be adapted for your organization with qualified professional help. The Alliance is not liable for any damages arising from use of or reliance on these resources. Views in individual posts and third-party links/logos are not Alliance endorsements. The Alliance is committed to equal opportunity and does not condone unlawful discrimination.

    For accreditation-related materials, please also consult the Land Trust Accreditation Commission website.

    Membership Required

    This resource is a Land Trust Alliance member benefit for the staff, board and volunteers of land trust and affiliate member organizations, and Alliance donors at the Protector level.