Hoffman Properties II, L.P. v. Commissioner
Author
About This Legal Opinion
The Tax Court ruled that the easement failed to satisfy the prohibition and preservation requirement of sec 170(h)(4)(B)(i). The court found that the default approval provision allowed any changes to the Building's exterior if the land trust failed to object within the 45-day window.
Disclaimer
These resources are provided "as is" for informational purposes only, without warranty of any kind. They do not constitute legal or professional advice and do not create an attorney-client relationship. They may not reflect current legal developments and should be adapted for your organization with qualified professional help. The Alliance is not liable for any damages arising from use of or reliance on these resources. Views in individual posts and third-party links/logos are not Alliance endorsements. The Alliance is committed to equal opportunity and does not condone unlawful discrimination.
For accreditation-related materials, please also consult the Land Trust Accreditation Commission website.