Gale as Trustee of Inertia Realty Trust v. Manchester Essex
Author
About This Legal Opinion
After reviewing the history of the roads dating back to 1710, the Land Court ruled that Gale had the right to a 20-foot-wide easement. Land Court found that the conservation easement could bind only the landowners of the protected property and was subordinate to the previously granted ROW.
Disclaimer
These resources are provided "as is" for informational purposes only, without warranty of any kind. They do not constitute legal or professional advice and do not create an attorney-client relationship. They may not reflect current legal developments and should be adapted for your organization with qualified professional help. The Alliance is not liable for any damages arising from use of or reliance on these resources. Views in individual posts and third-party links/logos are not Alliance endorsements. The Alliance is committed to equal opportunity and does not condone unlawful discrimination.
For accreditation-related materials, please also consult the Land Trust Accreditation Commission website.