Document / Legal Opinion

Don't Cell Our Parks v. City of San Diego

Posted 2018
Author
Robert H. Levin
About This Legal Opinion

The appellate court affirmed, holding that the Project did not constitute a changed use or purpose that required voter approval because the Project had a minor impact on the Park's footprint or aesthetic features, and also noted that the Project was consistent with park or recreation purposes

Disclaimer

These resources are provided "as is" for informational purposes only, without warranty of any kind. They do not constitute legal or professional advice and do not create an attorney-client relationship. They may not reflect current legal developments and should be adapted for your organization with qualified professional help. The Alliance is not liable for any damages arising from use of or reliance on these resources. Views in individual posts and third-party links/logos are not Alliance endorsements. The Alliance is committed to equal opportunity and does not condone unlawful discrimination.

For accreditation-related materials, please also consult the Land Trust Accreditation Commission website.