Committee of 100 on the Federal City v. Hodel, 250 U.S. App. D.C.
About This Legal Opinion
The appellate court, reversing the trial court, held that the transaction was an 'exchange' and not a 'boundary revision,' thus triggering one section of the statute and not another. The end result was to allow the transaction to stand.
Disclaimer
These resources are provided "as is" for informational purposes only, without warranty of any kind. They do not constitute legal or professional advice and do not create an attorney-client relationship. They may not reflect current legal developments and should be adapted for your organization with qualified professional help. The Alliance is not liable for any damages arising from use of or reliance on these resources. Views in individual posts and third-party links/logos are not Alliance endorsements. The Alliance is committed to equal opportunity and does not condone unlawful discrimination.
For accreditation-related materials, please also consult the Land Trust Accreditation Commission website.