Chittenden Resorts, LLC v. Gerlach
About This Legal Opinion
Court concludes that the loss of access for beginning skiers and the inability to use grooming equipment meant that the relocated trail did not provide the “substantially similar access” required for a landowner to relocate trails protected under access easement at its own expense.
Disclaimer
These resources are provided "as is" for informational purposes only, without warranty of any kind. They do not constitute legal or professional advice and do not create an attorney-client relationship. They may not reflect current legal developments and should be adapted for your organization with qualified professional help. The Alliance is not liable for any damages arising from use of or reliance on these resources. Views in individual posts and third-party links/logos are not Alliance endorsements. The Alliance is committed to equal opportunity and does not condone unlawful discrimination.
For accreditation-related materials, please also consult the Land Trust Accreditation Commission website.