Center for Rehabilitation of Wildlife, Inc. v. Franklin Land
About This Legal Opinion
The trial court found that the option language was ambiguous, and that extrinsic evidence supported the conclusion that the parties did not intend that the option provision would prohibit FLT's conveyance of a conservation easement. Appellate court affirmed.
Disclaimer
These resources are provided "as is" for informational purposes only, without warranty of any kind. They do not constitute legal or professional advice and do not create an attorney-client relationship. They may not reflect current legal developments and should be adapted for your organization with qualified professional help. The Alliance is not liable for any damages arising from use of or reliance on these resources. Views in individual posts and third-party links/logos are not Alliance endorsements. The Alliance is committed to equal opportunity and does not condone unlawful discrimination.
For accreditation-related materials, please also consult the Land Trust Accreditation Commission website.