Ball v. Virginia Outdoors Foundation
About This Legal Opinion
Plaintiff sought to rescind conservation easement because charitable deduction was denied. Court denied motion to dismiss on grounds that sovereign immunity does not apply to contracts and because easement stated the parties mutual intent was that it would qualify for the deduction.
Disclaimer
These resources are provided "as is" for informational purposes only, without warranty of any kind. They do not constitute legal or professional advice and do not create an attorney-client relationship. They may not reflect current legal developments and should be adapted for your organization with qualified professional help. The Alliance is not liable for any damages arising from use of or reliance on these resources. Views in individual posts and third-party links/logos are not Alliance endorsements. The Alliance is committed to equal opportunity and does not condone unlawful discrimination.
For accreditation-related materials, please also consult the Land Trust Accreditation Commission website.